Understand what happened during your creators’ live streams.
Give your agency or company a repeatable way to review creator activity. FeedNChat Agency connects observed live sessions, platform coverage, individual analytics and roster comparisons, so each performance discussion starts with the same period and data context.
Start with a question and a common reporting period
Before reviewing creator performance, choose what you want to understand: which live sessions took place, how the audience responded or how activity changed from the previous period. Select the authorised creators, platform and dates relevant to that question.
For example, a company working with four live creators can review the same week for each creator. Check the observed sessions and coverage first, then use compatible metrics to discuss activity, engagement and changes. This is a review workflow; results depend on the data available for those assignments.
Review live activity alongside audience and engagement
The Partner Portal shows aggregate audience, chat, growth and support metrics where supported and authorised. Individual analytics and previous-period comparisons help the manager connect the headline figures with a creator’s recent activity.
Use platform and content filters to find the observed sessions relevant to your project. Keep the platform and time range attached to every observation, especially when creators work across different live services.
- Review individual creators before comparing the roster.
- Filter observed live sessions and content for the relevant project.
- Check coverage and connection health before interpreting a change.
Compare creators with compatible data
Compare 2 to 10 authorised creators within a common period. Use those comparisons to find sessions worth reviewing and prepare a focused conversation with each creator. Platform differences and coverage remain part of the assessment.
Missing data is not zero activity. Live observations can be provisional, and an unobserved session does not prove a creator did no work. Donations, Bits and gifts retain their currencies or units; they should not be added together as one revenue figure.
- Use the same dates and supported metrics for each creator.
- Keep unavailable data distinct from measured zero values.
- Read changes together with the underlying sessions and platform context.
Turn the review into a report your team can use
Prepare authorised reports and export them as PDF, CSV or Excel for your team’s review process. Agree the period and scope with the people using the report, and discuss the observations with the creator before drawing wider conclusions.
Analytics access follows the creator assignment and data grant. FeedNChat provides aggregate observations rather than passwords or raw private chat. To discuss live streaming analytics for your agency or company, email support@feednchat.com with your roster size, platforms and reporting requirements.
A few things worth knowing.
How can an agency monitor its creators’ live activity?
Use an eligible creator assignment and its data grant, then review observed sessions, platform coverage and aggregate metrics in the Partner Portal. Filter the period and content relevant to your project before comparing creators or exporting a report.
Can we compare performance across a creator team?
FeedNChat supports comparisons of 2 to 10 compatible, authorised creators over a common period. The available metrics, platforms and data coverage determine which comparisons are meaningful.
Does a missing session mean the creator did not work?
No. Missing or unavailable observations do not prove zero activity. Review platform coverage, connection health and the reporting period, and discuss the session with the creator.
Can a company export creator analytics for internal reports?
Authorised reports can be exported as PDF, CSV or Excel within the permitted assignment and reporting period. Email support@feednchat.com to discuss your company’s roster, platforms, report requirements and agency service.